Honda CBR 150R vs Honda CBR 250R

Honda CBR 150R vs Honda CBR 250R

When Honda launched its CBR 250R in India, it instantly became a hit with the touring community. I've had loads of my friends upgrade from their Karizmas and P220s to the CBR 250 and never look back. Most 250 owners are still waiting for a worthy upgrade to come along. So when Honda later launched the CBR 150 which looked more or less the same as its elder brother, they already had the bar set pretty high. With an open mind I test rode the 150. Loved it, bought it. Now three years and 40k kms later when I search for my worthy upgrade, I wonder if the CBR 250R could be it. I took my friend’s 250 on a two day long test ride to find out.

Let me highlight the physical differences first. It would take a really skilled eye to tell them apart at first glance if they both had the same paintjobs. Thankfully, they don't. The 250 is also heavier and it doesn't hide its weight. Put both the bikes side by side and the 250 looks visibly bulkier. It has different tyres, exhaust, pilot lamps and instrument cluster back light. Apart from these minor differences, the two motorcycles look very similar but looks is where the similarities end. They are poles apart in terms of behaviour and temperament.

The first thing you notice on the 250 is its bulk. The bike feels sluggish and heavy to flick around in traffic. You need some serious steering inputs and body weight transfers to lean it into a corner but once leaned in, it feels rock steady. The 150 on the other hand is light, agile and overall a happier motorcycle when it sees corners. It also comes with harder sprung rear suspensions making it all the more composed in corners. Surprisingly though, it manages bumps and potholes much better than the 250 despite being the harder sprung motorcycle. If there’s one aspect of the CBR 150 which I keep looking for in other motorcycles is this near perfect balance between ride quality and handling. No other motorcycle I’ve ridden comes even close.

The next big difference between the siblings is the engine. Not just in terms of capacity but also the way they generate power is very different. The 250 has a moderate low range, a meaty mid range and a sluggish high range. The 150 on the other hand, has good power available in the low and high ranges. Honda forgot to add a mid range to this one. What that translates to on the road is, the 250 is happiest being between the 90 - 120 kph zone and that’s why it hits the sweet spot with tourers. The 150 can run that pace on the highway but with a lot more working up and down the gearbox. Talking about the gearbox, the transmission on the 150 is clunky to say the least. Honda have paid much more attention to the 250 in this area. When it comes to braking, the 150 provides enough bite and progression but no ABS. Not even as an option. The 250’s brakes lack the initial bite but provide progression and an optional ABS.

So, the verdict. The 150 is light, peppy and fun in the corners but seriously lacks mid range torque and ABS. The 250 is heavy, sluggish and boring but can sit at highway speeds all day long, without really having to downshift. Comparing these two is like comparing Pamela Anderson and Keira Knightley. If you like one of them, you will quite obviously not like the other. Me, I’m a Keira Knightley guy, I’ll stick with my CBR 150 for now…;-)

Popular posts from this blog

Royal Enfield Goan Classic 350: The Sussegado!

Suzuki Jimny 5 door: Ownership review

Triumph Scrambler 400X: The Only Motorcycle You'll Ever Need!